gnunn
I'm interested in hearing how people who are running pre-4E campaigns deal with weapon proficiencies -particularly in 3x- & with exotic weapons.
I have to admit, the rules for exotic weapons bug me a bit. While sometimes, a weapon is clearly exotic and would require extensive special training to use effectively (e.g. a spiked chain) other times, the classification seems unwarranted (barbed dagger, repeating crossbow) A repeating crossbow, for instance, functions just like any other crossbow when attacking. aim and shoot. The major change comes in how you reload at the end of the cartridge, so adding the default non-proficiency penalty to the attack roll, doesn't make a lot of sense.
It seems impractical for the vast majority of players to burn a feat just to become proficient in a particular exotic weapon... meaning that there are a whole slew of weapons on the equipment lists that likely never get used.
Does anyone else house-rule on weapon proficiencies to work around this, and if so, what do you do?
Comments
In my Pathfinder games, I use traits for extra weapon proficiencies. In Pathfinder, a trait is sometimes described as a 'half-feat'. If a player wants to take a group of related weapons, I would generally allow 3 related ones for a single feat. Presumably there is some interesting backstory and the 3 proficiencies would have to tie into that backstory.
Do what makes sense to you, as GM, and what fits in your world and with the character in question. That's what I say. :)
I mentioned the crossbow, because I basically have to hit our rogue's player in the face with any character options to get him to do anything besides backstab, or sit in the corner if he can't. I wanted to present him with a solid ranged attack option. Right now he uses hand crossbows which take a move action to reload and at 1d4 damage are seldom worth the effort. I thought a nice repeating crossbow with some magic effects might convince him to diversify his tactics.
I also had a wicked idea for a magic umbrella sword. In umbrella mode, it provides a resist elements effect, but you can also open it and draw a rapier from the handle to use as a sword and use the umbrella top as a light shield. If this were officially written up, it would totally be an exotic weapon, but I think I'll rule that it's too awesome to nail someone with proficiency penalties.
Orcs and half orc automatically get Double Axe, etc. There is also room for the periodic magic item that allows one temp use of the feat. Say for instance a pair of gloves that allow facility with the bladed chain, but only when worn.
Anyway, that is what works with my crowd. YMMV.
Game Designer, Pro GM, multiple ENnie Award winner
GM of Planejammer: The Spelljoined (Pathfinder 1e) Campaign of the Year 2011 and still going strong!
GM of The Planewalker's Guild (Pathfinder 1e)
Need a GM? Book me today!
Just my two cents. :)
I don't have any practical advice for the repeating crossbow versus other crossbows, but I do think if you're going to just *give* the rogue proficiency in it, then either make that part of its magic (ho-ho, fun to be had if someone else gets it!) or say that some sort of in-character training has to happen for the character to really get the hang of it.
If you opt for the latter, you have a prime opportunity for comedy. Imagine the rogue picking up the repeating crossbow for the first time, firing off a test shot, unwittingly continuing to hold down the trigger.... Much flailing and wild shooting and shouts of "wha!" to be had!
I still plan for there to be a penalty associated with using the crossbow while unproficient, but that penalty wont be for attacking with it. Rather, I was thinking perhaps some sort of skill check required in order to reload the weapon (disable device? straight Dex?), and if an unproficient user rolls a critical fail while attacking, the weapon jams and must be cleared before using again.
I feel like this does a better job of getting to the heart of why this particular weapon is exotic -it's a more complicated machine than other devices. Actually aiming and shooting, however is the same as with a non-repeater.
As for exotic weapons, I tend not to worry about that either. If I don't want one to fall into my players' hands I simply won't put one in the game. If they do get their mits on something exotic you can explain away their competence with it as something gained through rigorous practice without requiring them to actually spend a feat. If you really feel it is necessary to penalize them when they first get the exotic weapon, make the penalty simply go away over time as they use it and become more familiar with its workings.
That was a little rambly and a bit discombobulated but I'm tired and so must sleep :)
I agree totally with the re-load check rather than the attack penalty on the crossbow, by the way. Logic wins out yet again.