Comments

• 

  Baalshamon

  Posts: 585 November 2011

  Some examples of the moment are 2 of the five recently updated are unavailable to look at. Very agrrevating.
  
  "Page 1":http://www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/burningtransylvania
  "Page 2":http://www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/systemic
• 

  RaseCidraen

  Posts: 890 November 2011

  I feel the same way, Stephen! I got all excited when I found a bunch of Firefly campaigns that looked wonderful, but they'd been over for a year or more. Tragic!
• 

  Poutine_Paladin

  Posts: 285 November 2011

  I agree about the ones that are closed to the public, as it were, should be labeled as such so people don't waste their time clicking on them and get frustrated when they can't see it, but I don't necessarily see how a campaign that has finished isn't worth checking out, as (in theory) you can follow the progression to it's finale and see the wiki in it's final form.
• 

  HurstGM

  Posts: 205 November 2011

  Ive kept mine private when im working on them. Like if im buiilding them. Sometimes the players request it. I wonder how often the moderators delete games of non acended members that have been deactivated for a certain ammount of time.
• 

  Morrinn

  Posts: 166 November 2011

  I know it would be difficult to implement, but it would be ideal if a campaign that hasn't been updated in a few months would slip into an inactive category and would stop showing up on the front pages.
  As for private campaigns, yeah, those should just not show up at all, or have a clearly labeled privacy setting.